+ Is this wrapping list tight, or loose?
* This nested list is definitely tight.
-
-
In the above example, there’s at least three lists. The outermost +-based one, the definitely-tight *-based one, and the --based list(s).
-
commonmark.js thinks the
+-based list is tight. The*list is tight, and the-list is loose (and it stays loose, even if there’s text in one or both items). -
pulldown-cmark thinks the
+-based list is tight, and agrees with commonmark.js on the nested lists, too. -
commonmark-hs thinks the
+-based list is loose, unless there’s text after the first-, at which it becomes tight (the+list remains loose, even when there’s text after the second-) -
Markdown-it thinks there’s two
--based lists. The+-based list is loose, but, like commonmark-hs, becomes tight if text is put after the first-. -
Goldmark, which I tested by running Hugo, does this:
<ul> <li> Is this wrapping list tight, or loose? <ul> <li>This nested list is definitely tight.</li> </ul> <ul><li></li></ul> </li> </ul> <ul> <li></li> </ul>
I’ve also filed an issue at [fuzz result] counterintuitive list tightness · Issue #144 · jgm/commonmark-hs · GitHub
1 post - 1 participant
